VC LABIndustriesQA for SaaS

QA for SaaS: a testing department you don't have to hire

A team of a few developers ships releases every week, and whoever is free tests them. We become the external quality department: we know the product, maintain the regression suite, check every feature against requirements and say "ship it" based on a report, not a feeling.

Why one in-house tester is often not enough

In a small product team testing comes last: the developer checks their own feature, the product manager clicks through the main flow, the rest comes from users. Hiring a tester is slow and expensive for a workload that comes and goes: three days of work before a release, then a quiet week. An external team fits that rhythm: it switches on for the release, keeps the regression suite current and does not idle between releases at your expense.

What release support includes

  • Checks of new features against requirements or the task description, with negative scenarios and boundary values.
  • A regression suite for your product: updated with every release, run before every ship.
  • Cross-browser and cross-platform runs on real devices before releases that touch the interface.
  • API tests for public and internal interfaces: contracts, response schemas, error codes.
  • Migration and upgrade checks: existing users' data after a release.
  • Defects in your tracker with severity and priority; blockers in the team chat the day they are found.
Deliverables: a regression suite, a report before every release with a ship / no-ship decision and a list of known defects, a feature coverage matrix.

Entering a new market

A release in a new country is a story of its own. It is not only copy that changes: date and amount formats, addresses, phone numbers, payment providers, document and notification requirements. For such a release we combine localization with LQA in the interface and extend the regression suite with the new market's scenarios — so the first users see a finished product, not a beta.

For products entering Russia, Hong Kong, Cyprus and Armenia we have checklists of formats and local requirements; for other markets we build them with you before the first run.

How we get started

  1. Product onboarding: demo, documentation, access to the test environment and tracker.
  2. A first full run in exploratory mode and building the regression suite — one to two weeks.
  3. Release rhythm: regression before every ship, feature checks as they are ready, a weekly report.
  4. Quarterly suite review: retire outdated cases, add cases for new features.

Tools follow your process: Jira, Linear, YouTrack or GitHub Issues for defects, TestRail for cases, Playwright and Postman for API and flows, BrowserStack for devices.

FAQ

How much of your team's time do we need per week?
It depends on release frequency and product size. For a team with weekly releases the typical volume is one to three tester days a week; more before major releases and market launches. We bill on actuals in the first month, then fix the rate.
Will you automate the regression?
Manual regression is the base; automation is a separate contract once the suite has stabilised and repeats unchanged from release to release. Automating an unstable suite is throwing money away.
How do you know what should work if there is no documentation?
We go through the product in exploratory mode, record actual behaviour and agree with you what is normal and what is a defect. That becomes the first version of the requirements, even if only as a checklist.
Can we start with a single release?
Yes, that is how most engagements start: one release or one major feature as a pilot with a report at the end. Then we decide together whether the ongoing rhythm fits.

Tell us about your task

We reply within one business day and send an estimate in 1–2 days. Free of charge.

Updated: 2026-10-02